Employee Monitoring Law Planner
Sources

Texas Penal Code section 16.02 (interception, use or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications)

Law. Placed at Texas. Read 30 Sep 2026; 3 provisions cited by the planner.

What does Tex. Penal Code 16.02 require?

A person commits an offence by intentionally intercepting, trying to intercept, or getting someone else to intercept or try to intercept any wire, oral or electronic communication. Also cited: s 16.02(c)(4), private persons: intercept or record only as a party or with one party's prior consent, and never to further an aim outside the law; s 16.02(b)(2) and (3), do not disclose or use the contents of a communication known or suspected to have been unlawfully intercepted.

Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(1)Do not intentionally intercept, or procure another to intercept, a wire, oral or electronic communication

A person commits an offence by intentionally intercepting, trying to intercept, or getting someone else to intercept or try to intercept any wire, oral or electronic communication. Interception covers telephone calls, in-person conversations captured by a device, and email, messaging and network traffic in transit. An offence under this subsection is a second-degree felony.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of call recording, meeting capture, network monitoring and interception tools with the lawful basis for each (party status or one party's prior consent); Call-recording and monitoring procedures showing how consent is obtained and logged; Network monitoring scope limited to the employer's own systems with employee acknowledgement
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Recording calls between two third parties where no participant consented; Capturing guest Wi-Fi traffic; Vendor-operated recording with no documented consent basis
Source: Texas Penal Code section 16.02 (interception, use or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications), read 30 Sep 2026
Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(c)(4)Private persons: intercept or record only as a party or with one party's prior consent, and never to further an aim outside the law

It is an affirmative defence that a person not acting under colour of law intercepted a wire, oral or electronic communication while a party to it, or where one of the parties had given prior consent, unless the interception served an unlawful aim. This is Texas's one-party consent rule. A business relying on it must be a genuine party (for example, through a recording announcement that makes the company a participant to the call, or an employee who is on the call) or hold prior consent from a participant.

What a reviewer asks to see: Recording policy identifying who the consenting party is for each recording scenario (announcement on inbound lines, employee on the call, written consent); Scripts and logs of recording announcements; Rule that no recording is made to further an unlawful purpose (for example blackmail, tortious interference) with a review step
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Recording an employee's personal calls where no company party or consent exists; Treating a posted notice as consent for telephone calls where the caller cannot see it; Monitoring continued after an employee withdrew consent and left the call
Source: Texas Penal Code section 16.02 (interception, use or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications), read 30 Sep 2026
Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(2) and (3)Do not disclose or use the contents of a communication known or suspected to have been unlawfully intercepted

It is an offence to intentionally disclose, or try to disclose, what a wire, oral or electronic communication contained, knowing or having reason to know it was obtained by unlawful interception, and to intentionally use such contents while knowing or being reckless as to whether they were unlawfully obtained. Investigators, HR and legal teams who receive a recording from a third party must therefore establish how it was made before relying on it.

What a reviewer asks to see: Investigation procedure requiring the provenance of any recording or transcript to be established before use; Legal review record for recordings supplied by employees, customers or third parties; Quarantine and destruction log for recordings of doubtful origin
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Using a whistleblower's covert recording of a meeting they did not attend; Forwarding intercepted messages internally before provenance is checked
Source: Texas Penal Code section 16.02 (interception, use or disclosure of wire, oral or electronic communications), read 30 Sep 2026

Open the full text on compliance.theartofservice.com

See the specimen plan run Plan your own list