Employee Monitoring Law Planner
Laws

Employee monitoring laws by state

16 US states are built, on top of the federal layer that applies in every state. The other 35 (the District of Columbia counted) get the federal layer only, and the page says so rather than guessing.

Recording consent, state by state

16 states with a held recording law
StatePhone callsIn personWhat it asksProvisions
New Yorkone partyone partyNo wiretapping, mechanical overhearing of a conversation or interception of electronic communications without the consent of a party (for a conversation) or of the sender or receiver (for a call or an electronic message), or an eavesdropping warrant; the consent basis for each recording and interception tool is the record to hold.NY Penal Law s 250.05
Connecticutevery partynot statedRecord a private phone call only with the prior consent of all parties (in writing or at the start of the recording), a recorded verbal notice at the start, or an automatic warning tone about every fifteen seconds.Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d(a)
Delawareunresolved: the statutes differunresolved: the statutes differChapter 24 lets a party, or someone with one party's prior consent, intercept a call or conversation; the criminal code (s 1335(a)(4)) separately asks for the consent of all parties. The two are recorded side by side and not resolved: a question for counsel.Del. Code tit. 11 2402(a)(1) and (c)(4)Del. Code tit. 11 2401(8)
Californiaevery partyevery partyThe consent of every party before recording a confidential communication, and before recording any call involving a cellular or cordless phone.Cal. Penal Code 632(a)Cal. Penal Code 632.7(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a)
Illinoisevery partyevery partyNo surreptitious recording of a private conversation without the consent of every party; a business doing telephone sales, service or research may monitor its employees' calls for quality, training or research only with one active party's consent, with unmonitored personal lines, and with no onward use.Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(1)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(2)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(3)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j)
Texasone partyone partyNo intentional interception of a call, of an in-person conversation captured by a device, or of a message in transit, unless the recorder is a party to it or one party gave prior consent, and never to further an aim outside the law; contents known or suspected to come from an interception outside those terms are neither disclosed nor used.Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(1)Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(c)(4)Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(2) and (3)
Floridaevery partyevery partyCalls, in-person conversations where privacy is expected, and electronic messages in transit: the prior consent of all parties; one party's consent, the recorder's own included, is not enough. Provider-furnished telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business is outside the definition.Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.02(4)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(d)
Marylandevery partyevery partyRecord a call, a private conversation or a message in transit only as a party and with the prior consent of all parties.Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-401(8)
Massachusettsevery partyevery partyNo secret hearing or recording of a call or of spoken words without the prior authority of all parties; open recording the speakers know about is not an interception. Tariffed business telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business is outside the definition.M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.1M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.1M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 B.3 and D.1.bM.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.3
Michiganunsettled for a participantunsettled for a participantNo device to eavesdrop on a private conversation without the consent of all parties; whether a participant may record their own conversation is unsettled in the case law and recorded as such.MCL 539cMCL 539e
Montanaevery partyevery partyNo recording of a call or conversation by a hidden device without the knowledge of all parties; where the parties have been warned of the recording, either may record.Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213(1)(c)Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213(3)
Nevadaevery partyone partyPhone calls: not on one party's consent alone (the court has, as reported, required all parties); in-person private conversations: one participant's authority.NRS 200.620(1)NRS 200.650
New Hampshireevery partyevery partyCalls and conversations where privacy is expected: the consent of all parties, and a party to the conversation needs every other party's consent too.RSA 570-A:2, I(a)RSA 570-A:2, I(a)RSA 570-A:2, I-aRSA 570-A:1, IV(a)
Oregonone partyevery partyPhone and radio communications: a non-participant needs at least one participant's consent. In-person and video conference conversations: every participant specifically informed before it is obtained.ORS 165.540(1)(a)ORS 165.540(1)(c)ORS 165.543
Pennsylvaniaevery partyevery partyCalls, in-person conversations and messages in transit: the prior consent of all parties; telephone marketing and customer service calls may be monitored for training, quality control or monitoring with one party's consent, used only for those purposes and destroyed within one year.18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5704(15)18 Pa.C.S. 5704(15)
Washingtonevery partyevery partyThe consent of all participants before recording a call or a private conversation; consent is obtained once a party announces the recording to all others and the announcement itself is recorded.RCW 9.73.030(1)(a)RCW 9.73.030(1)(b)RCW 9.73.030(3)
Every other stateone party (federal)one party (federal)The federal Wiretap Act: a party, or a party's prior consent, or equipment used in the ordinary course of business. A call with someone in an all-party state is a question for that state's rule.ECPA 2511(2)(d)

The federal layer, every state

New York

NY Civil Rights Law, NY Labor Law, NY Penal Law

Connecticut

Conn. Gen. Stat., Conn. Gen. Stat., Conn. Gen. Stat.

Delaware

Del. Code tit. 19, Del. Code tit. 11

California

Cal. Penal Code, Cal. Penal Code, CCPA, Cal. Lab. Code

Illinois

BIPA, Illinois Eavesdropping Act

Texas

Texas CUBI, Tex. Penal Code

Florida

Fla. Stat.

Maryland

Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc.

Massachusetts

M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99

Michigan

MCL

Montana

Mont. Code Ann.

Nevada

NRS

New Hampshire

RSA

Oregon

ORS

Pennsylvania

18 Pa.C.S.

Washington

RCW

States not built

35

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming and District of Columbia. A line at a site in one of these reads the federal layer and the ILO baseline only; no state law is placed, which is not the same as none applying.

See the specimen plan run Plan your own list