Laws
Employee monitoring laws by state
16 US states are built, on top of the federal layer that applies in every state. The other 35 (the District of Columbia counted) get the federal layer only, and the page says so rather than guessing.
Recording consent, state by state
16 states with a held recording law| State | Phone calls | In person | What it asks | Provisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York | one party | one party | No wiretapping, mechanical overhearing of a conversation or interception of electronic communications without the consent of a party (for a conversation) or of the sender or receiver (for a call or an electronic message), or an eavesdropping warrant; the consent basis for each recording and interception tool is the record to hold. | NY Penal Law s 250.05 |
| Connecticut | every party | not stated | Record a private phone call only with the prior consent of all parties (in writing or at the start of the recording), a recorded verbal notice at the start, or an automatic warning tone about every fifteen seconds. | Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d(a) |
| Delaware | unresolved: the statutes differ | unresolved: the statutes differ | Chapter 24 lets a party, or someone with one party's prior consent, intercept a call or conversation; the criminal code (s 1335(a)(4)) separately asks for the consent of all parties. The two are recorded side by side and not resolved: a question for counsel. | Del. Code tit. 11 2402(a)(1) and (c)(4)Del. Code tit. 11 2401(8) |
| California | every party | every party | The consent of every party before recording a confidential communication, and before recording any call involving a cellular or cordless phone. | Cal. Penal Code 632(a)Cal. Penal Code 632.7(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a) |
| Illinois | every party | every party | No surreptitious recording of a private conversation without the consent of every party; a business doing telephone sales, service or research may monitor its employees' calls for quality, training or research only with one active party's consent, with unmonitored personal lines, and with no onward use. | Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(1)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(2)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(3)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j) |
| Texas | one party | one party | No intentional interception of a call, of an in-person conversation captured by a device, or of a message in transit, unless the recorder is a party to it or one party gave prior consent, and never to further an aim outside the law; contents known or suspected to come from an interception outside those terms are neither disclosed nor used. | Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(1)Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(c)(4)Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(2) and (3) |
| Florida | every party | every party | Calls, in-person conversations where privacy is expected, and electronic messages in transit: the prior consent of all parties; one party's consent, the recorder's own included, is not enough. Provider-furnished telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business is outside the definition. | Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.02(4)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(d) |
| Maryland | every party | every party | Record a call, a private conversation or a message in transit only as a party and with the prior consent of all parties. | Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-401(8) |
| Massachusetts | every party | every party | No secret hearing or recording of a call or of spoken words without the prior authority of all parties; open recording the speakers know about is not an interception. Tariffed business telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business is outside the definition. | M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.1M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.1M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 B.3 and D.1.bM.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.3 |
| Michigan | unsettled for a participant | unsettled for a participant | No device to eavesdrop on a private conversation without the consent of all parties; whether a participant may record their own conversation is unsettled in the case law and recorded as such. | MCL 539cMCL 539e |
| Montana | every party | every party | No recording of a call or conversation by a hidden device without the knowledge of all parties; where the parties have been warned of the recording, either may record. | Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213(1)(c)Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213(3) |
| Nevada | every party | one party | Phone calls: not on one party's consent alone (the court has, as reported, required all parties); in-person private conversations: one participant's authority. | NRS 200.620(1)NRS 200.650 |
| New Hampshire | every party | every party | Calls and conversations where privacy is expected: the consent of all parties, and a party to the conversation needs every other party's consent too. | RSA 570-A:2, I(a)RSA 570-A:2, I(a)RSA 570-A:2, I-aRSA 570-A:1, IV(a) |
| Oregon | one party | every party | Phone and radio communications: a non-participant needs at least one participant's consent. In-person and video conference conversations: every participant specifically informed before it is obtained. | ORS 165.540(1)(a)ORS 165.540(1)(c)ORS 165.543 |
| Pennsylvania | every party | every party | Calls, in-person conversations and messages in transit: the prior consent of all parties; telephone marketing and customer service calls may be monitored for training, quality control or monitoring with one party's consent, used only for those purposes and destroyed within one year. | 18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5704(15)18 Pa.C.S. 5704(15) |
| Washington | every party | every party | The consent of all participants before recording a call or a private conversation; consent is obtained once a party announces the recording to all others and the announcement itself is recorded. | RCW 9.73.030(1)(a)RCW 9.73.030(1)(b)RCW 9.73.030(3) |
| Every other state | one party (federal) | one party (federal) | The federal Wiretap Act: a party, or a party's prior consent, or equipment used in the ordinary course of business. A call with someone in an all-party state is a question for that state's rule. | ECPA 2511(2)(d) |
The federal layer, every state
- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo interception of calls or messages unless an exception applies: a party's prior consent (never for a criminal or tortious purpose), or equipment used in the ordinary course of business. Both are conditions to show, not a default. ECPA 2511(1)(a)ECPA 2511(2)(d)ECPA 2510(5)(a)
- Personal devicesstatutory requirementAn employer can authorise access to messages on a service it provides; that does not reach an employee's personal webmail or accounts, which need the user's authorisation. (if personal devices are monitored) SCA 2701(a)SCA 2701(c)(1)SCA 2701(c)(2)
New York
NY Civil Rights Law, NY Labor Law, NY Penal Law- Noticestatutory requirementWritten notice on hiring to every employee whose telephone, email or internet use is monitored, acknowledged by the employee in writing or electronically, and the notice posted in a conspicuous place. NY Civil Rights Law 52-c(2)(a)NY Civil Rights Law 52-c(2)(a)NY Civil Rights Law 52-c(2)(b)
- Noticestatutory requirementSecurity video sits outside the Penal Law surveillance offences only where a prominent written notice on the premises says video surveillance is installed for security, or the devices are fitted so that anyone sees them at once. NY Penal Law s 250.65
- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo wiretapping, mechanical overhearing of a conversation or interception of electronic communications without the consent of a party (for a conversation) or of the sender or receiver (for a call or an electronic message), or an eavesdropping warrant; the consent basis for each recording and interception tool is the record to hold. NY Penal Law s 250.05
- Limitsstatutory requirementIntercepting or accessing an electronic communication needs the consent of a sender or receiver, or a warrant: for email, voicemail and network monitoring the consent basis for each tool is the record to hold. NY Penal Law s 250.05
Connecticut
Conn. Gen. Stat., Conn. Gen. Stat., Conn. Gen. Stat.- Noticestatutory requirementPrior written notice to every employee who may be affected, naming the types of monitoring and the specific locations on the premises where it may occur, posted conspicuously including at those locations; and a plain-language statement to each new hire before they start. (the replacement text takes effect 1 October 2026 (Public Act 26-73); before that date it is not in force) Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-48d(b)(1)Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-48d(b)(1)Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-48d(b)(1)Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-48d(b)(3)
- Recording consentstatutory requirementRecord a private phone call only with the prior consent of all parties (in writing or at the start of the recording), a recorded verbal notice at the start, or an automatic warning tone about every fifteen seconds. Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d(a)
- Covert monitoringstatutory requirementMonitoring without prior written notice only on reasonable grounds to believe employees are breaking the law or others' rights, or creating a hostile workplace, where monitoring may produce evidence. (the replacement text takes effect 1 October 2026 (Public Act 26-73); before that date it is not in force) Conn. Gen. Stat. 31-48d(b)(2)
Delaware
Del. Code tit. 19, Del. Code tit. 11- Noticestatutory requirementBefore monitoring telephone, email or internet use: an electronic notice each day the employee uses the employer's email or internet, or a one-time notice the employee acknowledges. Del. Code tit. 19 705(b)Del. Code tit. 19 705(b)(1)Del. Code tit. 19 705(b)(2)
- Recording consentstatutory requirementChapter 24 lets a party, or someone with one party's prior consent, intercept a call or conversation; the criminal code (s 1335(a)(4)) separately asks for the consent of all parties. The two are recorded side by side and not resolved: a question for counsel. Del. Code tit. 11 2402(a)(1) and (c)(4)Del. Code tit. 11 2401(8)
California
Cal. Penal Code, Cal. Penal Code, CCPA, Cal. Lab. Code- Noticestatutory requirementAt or before collection, tell staff the categories collected, the purposes, and how long each is kept. (when you say the business meets the CCPA thresholds) CCPA 1798.100(a)CCPA CCR 7012
- Recording consentstatutory requirementThe consent of every party before recording a confidential communication, and before recording any call involving a cellular or cordless phone. Cal. Penal Code 632(a)Cal. Penal Code 632.7(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a)
- Places kept privatestatutory requirementFrom the day Part 5.8 takes effect: no workplace surveillance tool of any kind (video, audio, location, badge logging, wearables, time tracking) monitors employees in a workplace bathroom, save a court order and one-time entry and exit checks; employees may leave a tool they carry outside the room, and a badge or alarm they must carry captures no audio or video and carries no embedded AI. (where it covers toilets or washrooms and showers or bathing areas) Cal. Lab. Code s 1560Cal. Lab. Code s 1560
- Limitsstatutory requirementReading or learning the contents of a message in transit needs the consent of every party; an organisation that deploys a third party tool doing so can be exposed too. Cal. Penal Code 631(a)Cal. Penal Code 631(a)
- Biometric datastatutory requirementBiometric data processed to identify a person is sensitive personal information; staff can limit its use to the purposes the Act and regulations allow. (when you say the business meets the CCPA thresholds) CCPA 1798.121
- Assessmentstatutory requirementCollection proportionate to its purpose; a risk assessment before processing the regulations treat as a significant risk, which includes automated inferences about employees drawn from systematic observation. (when you say the business meets the CCPA thresholds) CCPA 1798.100(c)CCPA CCR 7150
- Retentionstatutory requirementRetention periods disclosed and no longer than reasonably necessary. (when you say the business meets the CCPA thresholds) CCPA 1798.100(a)
Illinois
BIPA, Illinois Eavesdropping Act- Noticestatutory requirementWhere the business telephone monitoring exemption is relied on: tell current and prospective employees, including by prominent signs. Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j)
- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo surreptitious recording of a private conversation without the consent of every party; a business doing telephone sales, service or research may monitor its employees' calls for quality, training or research only with one active party's consent, with unmonitored personal lines, and with no onward use. Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(1)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(2)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-2(a)(3)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j)Illinois Eavesdropping Act 14-3(j)
- Biometric datastatutory requirementBefore the first collection: written notice that a biometric identifier is collected, the specific purpose and term in writing, and a written release; a public retention schedule with destruction when the purpose is met or within three years of the last interaction; no disclosure without consent. BIPA s 15(a)BIPA s 15(b)(1)BIPA s 15(b)(2)BIPA s 15(b)(3)BIPA s 15(d)
- Retentionstatutory requirementDestroyed when the purpose is met or within three years of the last interaction, whichever comes first. BIPA s 15(a)
Texas
Texas CUBI, Tex. Penal Code- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo intentional interception of a call, of an in-person conversation captured by a device, or of a message in transit, unless the recorder is a party to it or one party gave prior consent, and never to further an aim outside the law; contents known or suspected to come from an interception outside those terms are neither disclosed nor used. Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(1)Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(c)(4)Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(2) and (3)
- Limitsstatutory requirementEmail, messaging and network traffic in transit are communications the section reaches: interception needs the recorder to be a party or one party's prior consent. Tex. Penal Code s 16.02(b)(1)
- Biometric datastatutory requirementInform and obtain consent before capture; destroy within a reasonable time and at the latest one year after the purpose ends, which for an employer's security identifiers is the end of employment. Texas CUBI 503.001(b)(1)Texas CUBI 503.001(b)(2)Texas CUBI 503.001(c)(3)Texas CUBI 503.001(c-2)
Florida
Fla. Stat.- Recording consentstatutory requirementCalls, in-person conversations where privacy is expected, and electronic messages in transit: the prior consent of all parties; one party's consent, the recorder's own included, is not enough. Provider-furnished telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business is outside the definition. Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.02(4)(a)Fla. Stat. 934.03(1)(d)
Maryland
Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc.- Recording consentstatutory requirementRecord a call, a private conversation or a message in transit only as a party and with the prior consent of all parties. Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(a)(1)Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-401(8)
Massachusetts
M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo secret hearing or recording of a call or of spoken words without the prior authority of all parties; open recording the speakers know about is not an interception. Tariffed business telephone equipment used in the ordinary course of business is outside the definition. M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.1M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.1M.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 B.3 and D.1.bM.G.L. c. 272 s. 99 C.3
Michigan
MCL- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo device to eavesdrop on a private conversation without the consent of all parties; whether a participant may record their own conversation is unsettled in the case law and recorded as such. MCL 539cMCL 539e
Montana
Mont. Code Ann.- Recording consentstatutory requirementNo recording of a call or conversation by a hidden device without the knowledge of all parties; where the parties have been warned of the recording, either may record. Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213(1)(c)Mont. Code Ann. 45-8-213(3)
Nevada
NRS- Recording consentstatutory requirementPhone calls: not on one party's consent alone (the court has, as reported, required all parties); in-person private conversations: one participant's authority. NRS 200.620(1)NRS 200.650
- Recording consentstatutory requirementCalls and conversations where privacy is expected: the consent of all parties, and a party to the conversation needs every other party's consent too. RSA 570-A:2, I(a)RSA 570-A:2, I(a)RSA 570-A:2, I-aRSA 570-A:1, IV(a)
Oregon
ORS- Recording consentstatutory requirementPhone and radio communications: a non-participant needs at least one participant's consent. In-person and video conference conversations: every participant specifically informed before it is obtained. ORS 165.540(1)(a)ORS 165.540(1)(c)ORS 165.543
Pennsylvania
18 Pa.C.S.- Recording consentstatutory requirementCalls, in-person conversations and messages in transit: the prior consent of all parties; telephone marketing and customer service calls may be monitored for training, quality control or monitoring with one party's consent, used only for those purposes and destroyed within one year. 18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5703(1)18 Pa.C.S. 5704(15)18 Pa.C.S. 5704(15)
Washington
RCW- Recording consentstatutory requirementThe consent of all participants before recording a call or a private conversation; consent is obtained once a party announces the recording to all others and the announcement itself is recorded. RCW 9.73.030(1)(a)RCW 9.73.030(1)(b)RCW 9.73.030(3)
States not built
35Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming and District of Columbia. A line at a site in one of these reads the federal layer and the ILO baseline only; no state law is placed, which is not the same as none applying.