Employee Monitoring Law Planner
Laws

Victorian workplace surveillance laws: employee monitoring

What Employee Monitoring Law Planner sets out for a monitoring practice at a site in Victoria: the notice, the written policy, the representative step, recording consent and what is not allowed, each cited to the law or the official guidance behind it. This is not every law that applies there.

Location
Victoria
Laws placed
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999
Guidance placed
ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 official guidance, not law
Read on
30 Sep 2026
Conditions
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) is placed when you say the Privacy Act applies; "not sure" places it as a question.

What each practice needs here

20 practice classes
PracticeRepresentative stepNotice and policyRecording consentNot allowedPaperwork
AI emotion or sentiment detectionnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Keystroke loggingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldstatutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Screenshots or screen recordingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldstatutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Productivity or activity scoringnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldstatutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Idle-time trackingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldstatutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Webcam or presence checksnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in toilets, washrooms, change, lactation rooms (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms, showers or bathing areas and lactation, nursing or parent rooms)statutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Email and messaging reviewnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
DLP and email content filteringnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Website or email blockingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Web and app usage loggingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Biometric time clocknone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Access control logsnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
CCTV (break, change or wash rooms)none heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in toilets, washrooms, change, lactation rooms (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms, showers or bathing areas and lactation, nursing or parent rooms)none held
CCTV (work areas)none heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in toilets, washrooms, change, lactation rooms (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms, showers or bathing areas and lactation, nursing or parent rooms)none held
GPS or vehicle telematicsnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Mobile device locationnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Call or speech analyticsnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)statutory requirementevery party (non-party)interception law namedstatutory requirementnot in toilets, washrooms, change, lactation rooms (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms, showers or bathing areas and lactation, nursing or parent rooms)none held
Call recordingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)statutory requirementevery party (non-party)interception law namedstatutory requirementnot in toilets, washrooms, change, lactation rooms (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms, showers or bathing areas and lactation, nursing or parent rooms)none held
Social media monitoringnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held
Background checks as ongoing monitoringnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldnone heldnone held

Every requirement held here

Findings a line here can raise

10 of 13

Named, not quoted

Named so you know to open them. We do not hold their text and the page does not state what they require beyond the subject.

The provisions cited here

18 provisions
ILO code para 12.2(b)Inform and consult representatives before introducing electronic monitoring official guidance, not law

Where workers' representatives exist, and in line with national law and practice, inform and consult them before electronic surveillance of how workers act at work is brought in.

What a reviewer asks to see: Consultation record for each monitoring system, dated before introduction, with the representatives' views and the employer's response
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring tool piloted without consulting the representatives
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
APP 5Notification of the collection of personal information

Notify individuals of the collection of their personal information and the matters set out in APP 5.

What a reviewer asks to see: Collection notices (APP 5 matters); Timing of notification
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: No collection notice; Notice missing APP 5 matters
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.14(1)Tell workers in advance about monitoring and minimize intrusion official guidance, not law

Before any monitoring starts, workers should learn why it is done, when it runs, how it works (methods and techniques) and which data it gathers, and the employer must keep the intrusion on workers' privacy as small as possible.

What a reviewer asks to see: Monitoring notice per system stating reasons, schedule, methods and data collected, issued before monitoring starts; Proportionality assessment showing less intrusive options considered
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Notice states only that monitoring may occur, without schedule or methods; Screenshots captured continuously when sampling would serve the purpose
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 5.8Keep workers and representatives informed official guidance, not law

Workers and their representatives should be told about every data collection process, the rules governing it and their rights.

What a reviewer asks to see: Worker privacy notice covering each collection process, its rules and workers' rights; Record of the information given to worker representatives
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Notice covers HR records but not monitoring systems
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
APP 1Open and transparent management of personal information

Manage personal information in an open and transparent way, including having a clearly expressed and up-to-date APP privacy policy.

What a reviewer asks to see: Published APP privacy policy; Evidence of open data-handling practices; Policy review records
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: No APP privacy policy; Policy out of date; Practices not transparent
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.14(2)Secret monitoring only where national law allows it or on reasonable suspicion official guidance, not law

Covert monitoring should be allowed only where national law permits it or where there are reasonable grounds to suspect a crime or other grave misconduct.

What a reviewer asks to see: Authorization record for each covert monitoring exercise with the suspicion and grounds, or the legal provision relied on; End date and review of each exercise
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Covert monitoring used for general performance concerns
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 9BNo optical or listening device in workplace toilets, washrooms, change rooms or lactation rooms

No employer knowingly installs, uses or maintains a camera or other optical surveillance device, or any listening device, to watch, listen to, record or monitor what workers do or say in workplace toilets, washrooms, lactation rooms or change rooms. This applies whether or not the workers consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, and where a condition of a liquor licence under the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 requires it. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; otherwise 1200 penalty units; officers of a body corporate who fail to exercise due diligence are liable (s 32A), and for an unincorporated body or firm the members of its committee of management or the partners are liable (s 9D).

What a reviewer asks to see: Site plans marking every toilet, washroom, change room and lactation room, with confirmation no camera or microphone covers them; Commissioning sign-off on camera fields of view and audio settings near these rooms; Written instruction to security and facilities contractors prohibiting devices in these rooms; Where a liquor licence condition requires coverage, a copy of the condition and a record limiting coverage to it
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Lactation rooms not identified as prohibited areas; Entry cameras with views into change rooms or washrooms; Assumption that worker consent makes such surveillance lawful
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 7No optical device on a private activity without every party's consent

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains an optical surveillance device to watch or visually record a private activity they are not part of unless every party to it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, law enforcement officers on premises with the occupier's authority where reasonably necessary to protect someone's lawful interests, and incidental recording by the overt use of body-worn cameras or tablets by police, ambulance officers and prescribed persons. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). Because a private activity excludes activity outside a building or where the parties ought to expect being observed, openly signed workplace CCTV in ordinary work areas is generally outside s 7, while cameras watching activity in places where workers reasonably expect privacy need consent (and Part 2A bans some places outright).

What a reviewer asks to see: Camera register with the location of each camera and an assessment of whether activity there could be private; Signage and worker notice showing cameras are overt, supporting that activity in view is not private; Consent record for any camera observing areas where private activities may occur
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Hidden cameras in offices or rooms where workers reasonably expect privacy; Cameras whose view reaches into private areas without consent; No assessment of whether a camera location captures private activity
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 6No listening device on a private conversation without every party's consent

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a listening device to eavesdrop on, listen to, record or monitor a private conversation they are not part of unless every party to it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, specified law enforcement safety monitoring with one party's consent, and incidental recording by the overt use of body-worn cameras or tablets by police, ambulance officers and prescribed persons. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). A party to a conversation recording it is not caught by s 6, but communicating or publishing that recording is restricted by s 11. For employers, audio capture of workers' private conversations (for example audio-enabled CCTV, call or meeting recording by a non-party) needs the consent of every party.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of devices able to capture audio, with audio disabled or the consent basis recorded for each; Call and meeting recording notices that obtain the consent of every party where the employer or its system is not itself a party; Legal review record before any audio monitoring of workers
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: CCTV with audio enabled in offices, break rooms or vehicles; Supervisors listening in to private conversations through intercoms or phone systems; Reliance on a sign where consent from each party is needed
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
APP 3Collection of solicited personal information

Only collect personal information that is reasonably necessary for the entity's functions or activities, by lawful and fair means.

What a reviewer asks to see: Justification of necessity for collection; Lawful and fair collection methods; Heightened protection for sensitive information
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Over-collection; Unlawful/unfair collection; Sensitive info collected without consent
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.14(3)Continuous monitoring only for health and safety or protection of property official guidance, not law

Monitoring that never stops should be allowed only where it is needed for workplace health and safety or to protect property.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of continuous monitoring (CCTV, telematics, always-on tracking) with the health, safety or property ground for each
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Always-on webcam or activity tracking for remote staff justified by productivity
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 5.6Monitoring data not the sole basis of performance evaluation official guidance, not law

Output from electronic surveillance should never be the sole input when a worker's performance is judged.

What a reviewer asks to see: Appraisal procedure listing the evidence sources considered besides monitoring data; Sample appraisals showing other inputs (manager review, outputs, feedback)
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Productivity scores from activity tracking used as the whole appraisal
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
APP 11Security of personal information

Take reasonable steps to protect personal information from misuse, interference, loss and unauthorised access, modification or disclosure, and destroy or de-identify it when no longer needed.

What a reviewer asks to see: Information security controls for personal information; Destruction/de-identification of redundant PI
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: PI not secured; Redundant PI retained
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 8.5Retain only as long as the purpose justifies official guidance, not law

Keep personal data only as long as the specific purposes of collection justify, unless a worker asks to stay on a candidate list for a set period, national law requires retention, or the employer or worker needs the data for legal proceedings about an existing or former employment relationship.

What a reviewer asks to see: Retention schedule for worker data including monitoring records, citing purpose, legal requirement or proceedings; Deletion logs
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring recordings kept indefinitely; Unsuccessful applicants' data kept without their agreement
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 8No tracking device without the consent of the person, or of whoever holds the object

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a tracking device to find where a person is without that person's express or implied consent, or where an object is unless whoever lawfully possesses or controls it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, and orders under the Serious Offenders Act 2018, parole orders, community correction orders, prison governor orders and bail electronic monitoring conditions. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). Employer GPS on vehicles or devices it lawfully possesses or controls rests on that possession or control; tracking a worker as a person, or through their own phone or vehicle, needs the worker's consent.

What a reviewer asks to see: Asset register showing each tracked vehicle or device is owned, leased or controlled by the employer; Written worker consent before tracking through personal phones, apps or personal vehicles; Tracking policy stating what is tracked, when, and on what basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Location apps installed on personal phones without consent; Tracking of workers as individuals (for example wearables) without consent; Trackers left active on vehicles no longer in the employer's possession
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 5.1Fair, employment-related processing within the law official guidance, not law

5.1 Lawful, fair and employment-related processing. Handle workers' data lawfully and fairly, and solely for reasons that bear directly on the person's job.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of worker data processing activities, each with its employment-related reason and legal basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Data collected for reasons unrelated to the job, such as off-duty social media activity
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.5No data on sex life, beliefs or convictions, save exceptionally official guidance, not law

Employers should not collect data on a worker's sex life, political, religious or other beliefs, or criminal convictions, except in rare cases where national law permits it and the information bears directly on a decision about the job.

What a reviewer asks to see: Data inventory confirming these categories are not collected, or the documented exception and legal basis where they are
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Criminal record checks for every role regardless of relevance
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.6No data on union membership or activities unless required official guidance, not law

Employers should not collect data on a worker's membership of a workers' organization or trade union activities unless the law or a collective agreement requires or permits it.

What a reviewer asks to see: Review of HR and monitoring systems confirming union data are not collected except under a stated legal or agreement basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring tools flag union-related email or chat
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026

See the specimen plan run Plan your own list