Employee Monitoring Law Planner
Laws

Employee monitoring laws in New South Wales: the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005

What Employee Monitoring Law Planner sets out for a monitoring practice at a site in New South Wales: the notice, the written policy, the representative step, recording consent and what is not allowed, each cited to the law or the official guidance behind it. This is not every law that applies there.

Location
New South Wales
Laws placed
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005; NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007
Guidance placed
ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 official guidance, not law
Read on
30 Sep 2026
Conditions
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) is placed when you say the Privacy Act applies; "not sure" places it as a question.

What each practice needs here

20 practice classes
PracticeRepresentative stepNotice and policyRecording consentNot allowedPaperwork
AI emotion or sentiment detectionnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Keystroke loggingnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)statutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Screenshots or screen recordingnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)statutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Productivity or activity scoringnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)statutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Idle-time trackingnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)statutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Webcam or presence checksnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysvisible, signsAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)statutory requirementreasonably necessary (when you say the Privacy Act applies)
Email and messaging reviewnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
DLP and email content filteringnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Website or email blockingnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiedpolicy, delivery noticenone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Web and app usage loggingnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)written policy, notifiednone heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Biometric time clocknone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Access control logsnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
CCTV (break, change or wash rooms)none heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysvisible, signsAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
CCTV (work areas)none heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysvisible, signsAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
GPS or vehicle telematicsnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysnotice on vehicleAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Mobile device locationnone heldstatutory requirementnotice 14 daysnotice on vehicleAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Call or speech analyticsnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)statutory requirementevery party, or narrow exceptioninterception law namedstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Call recordingnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)statutory requirementevery party, or narrow exceptioninterception law namedstatutory requirementnot in change rooms, toilets, showers (where it covers toilets or washrooms, change or locker rooms and showers or bathing areas)not outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Social media monitoringnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot outside work (if it runs outside work)none held
Background checks as ongoing monitoringnone heldstatutory requirementAPP 5 notice (when you say the Privacy Act applies)none heldstatutory requirementnot outside work (if it runs outside work)none held

Every requirement held here

Findings a line here can raise

11 of 13

Named, not quoted

Named so you know to open them. We do not hold their text and the page does not state what they require beyond the subject.

The provisions cited here

31 provisions
ILO code para 12.2(b)Inform and consult representatives before introducing electronic monitoring official guidance, not law

Where workers' representatives exist, and in line with national law and practice, inform and consult them before electronic surveillance of how workers act at work is brought in.

What a reviewer asks to see: Consultation record for each monitoring system, dated before introduction, with the representatives' views and the employer's response
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring tool piloted without consulting the representatives
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 10Written notice of surveillance at least 14 days before it starts

Before surveillance of an employee begins, the employer gives the employee written notice (email counts as writing). The notice goes out no later than 14 days ahead of the start, unless the employee agrees to a shorter period; where surveillance is already running when someone is hired, or will start within 14 days of their first day, the notice is given before that person starts work. The notice states: the kind of surveillance (camera, computer or tracking); how it will be carried out; when it will start; whether it will be continuous or intermittent; and whether it will run for a specified limited period or be ongoing. No notice is needed for camera surveillance at a workplace that is not one of the employee's usual workplaces. Surveillance without a compliant notice is covert surveillance (s 19).

What a reviewer asks to see: Dated written or emailed surveillance notice to each affected employee covering the five required items: kind, method, start date, continuous or intermittent, limited period or ongoing; Distribution record (email log or signed acknowledgement) showing each notice went out at least 14 days before the system went live; Onboarding checklist step issuing the surveillance notice to new starters before their first day; Written employee agreement to any notice period shorter than 14 days
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Notice issued on the go-live day or after surveillance has started; Notice says only that the company may monitor systems, with no start date or continuous or intermittent statement; New starters receive the notice in their first week rather than before starting; Notice never reissued when a new kind of surveillance (for example GPS added to vehicles) is introduced
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 11Camera surveillance: cameras visible and signs at each entrance

Camera surveillance of an employee is carried out only where the cameras (or housings or other fittings that ordinarily reveal a camera) can be clearly seen in the place under surveillance and signs that can be plainly seen at every way into that place tell people they may be under surveillance there. These conditions apply in addition to the s 10 notice.

What a reviewer asks to see: Camera register listing each camera, its location and a photograph showing it is visibly mounted or housed; Site plan marking every entrance to each monitored area with the location of the surveillance sign; Periodic walk-through inspection record confirming signs are in place and legible and cameras remain visible
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Signs at the main entrance only, not at side, loading dock or staff entrances; Concealed or disguised cameras used for routine monitoring without a covert surveillance authority; Cameras added over time without updating signage or the camera register
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 13Tracking surveillance: visible notice on the tracked vehicle or thing

Tracking surveillance of an employee that tracks a vehicle or other thing is carried out only where a plainly visible notice on the vehicle or item shows that it is subject to tracking surveillance. This is in addition to the s 10 notice to the employee.

What a reviewer asks to see: Fleet or asset register listing every tracked vehicle or device with its tracking notice status; Photographs or inspection record of the tracking notice fixed on each vehicle or tracked item; Procedure requiring the notice to be fitted before a tracker is activated on a new or replacement vehicle
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Pool or replacement vehicles fitted with telematics but no visible notice; Tracking apps on employer phones treated as outside the notice requirement; Notice placed where the driver cannot readily see it
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
APP 5Notification of the collection of personal information

Notify individuals of the collection of their personal information and the matters set out in APP 5.

What a reviewer asks to see: Collection notices (APP 5 matters); Timing of notification
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: No collection notice; Notice missing APP 5 matters
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.14(1)Tell workers in advance about monitoring and minimize intrusion official guidance, not law

Before any monitoring starts, workers should learn why it is done, when it runs, how it works (methods and techniques) and which data it gathers, and the employer must keep the intrusion on workers' privacy as small as possible.

What a reviewer asks to see: Monitoring notice per system stating reasons, schedule, methods and data collected, issued before monitoring starts; Proportionality assessment showing less intrusive options considered
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Notice states only that monitoring may occur, without schedule or methods; Screenshots captured continuously when sampling would serve the purpose
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 5.8Keep workers and representatives informed official guidance, not law

Workers and their representatives should be told about every data collection process, the rules governing it and their rights.

What a reviewer asks to see: Worker privacy notice covering each collection process, its rules and workers' rights; Record of the information given to worker representatives
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Notice covers HR records but not monitoring systems
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 12Computer surveillance: written policy notified in advance

Computer surveillance of an employee is carried out only as the employer's written policy on monitoring staff computer use allows, and only after the employee has been told of that policy in advance in a way that makes it reasonable to assume the employee knows and understands it. Monitoring outside what the policy describes is not covered.

What a reviewer asks to see: Approved computer surveillance policy describing what is monitored (email, web, application or device activity) and how; Record that each employee received the policy before monitoring began, with acknowledgement or training completion; Configuration record or tool inventory showing monitoring settings match what the policy describes
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Policy buried in an intranet page employees were never directed to; Monitoring tool captures screenshots or keystrokes the policy does not mention; Policy last acknowledged years ago and not reissued after the monitoring scope changed
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 17Blocking email or internet access only under a notified policy, with prevented delivery notice

The employer stops an email to or from an employee getting through, or blocks access to a website, only when acting under an email and internet access policy notified to the employee in advance so that the employee can reasonably be taken to know and understand it. When an email is blocked, the employee is told as soon as practicable (a prevented delivery notice), by email or otherwise. No notice is needed where the email was blocked as spam (a commercial electronic message under the Spam Act 2003), because it or an attachment could have interfered with or damaged the employer's computers, network, programs or data, or because reasonable persons would regard it as menacing, harassing or offensive, or, for an outgoing email, where the employer did not know and could not reasonably know which employee sent it or that an employee sent it. The policy may not allow blocking merely because a message comes from an industrial organisation of employees or its officer, or because the email or website contains information about industrial matters. Maximum penalty 50 penalty units.

What a reviewer asks to see: Email and internet access policy with evidence it was notified to each employee in advance; Mail gateway configuration showing quarantine or block events generate a notice to the affected employee, with the permitted exceptions documented; Web filter category list reviewed to confirm union and industrial relations content is not blocked as such
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Emails silently quarantined with no prevented delivery notice to the employee; Filtering categories block union websites or messages from union officials; Blocking policy exists but was never communicated to staff
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
APP 1Open and transparent management of personal information

Manage personal information in an open and transparent way, including having a clearly expressed and up-to-date APP privacy policy.

What a reviewer asks to see: Published APP privacy policy; Evidence of open data-handling practices; Policy review records
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: No APP privacy policy; Policy out of date; Practices not transparent
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 19No covert surveillance of employees at work without a covert surveillance authority

The employer does not conduct, or arrange, covert surveillance of staff at work unless a covert surveillance authority issued by a Magistrate authorises it. Covert surveillance is any surveillance of an employee at work that does not meet Part 2 (notice, camera visibility and signs, computer policy, tracking notice). Maximum penalty 50 penalty units. Section 21 excludes law enforcement officers acting under other laws, cameras in correctional centres or custody, casino monitoring under the Casino Control Act 1992 and cameras recording legal proceedings; s 22 gives a security defence.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of covert surveillance authorities held, each with issue date, expiry and scope; Investigation procedure requiring legal review and an authority before any hidden camera, hidden software or undisclosed tracking is used; Audit of surveillance systems confirming every system in use meets Part 2 or is covered by a current authority
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Hidden camera installed after a theft without applying for an authority; Monitoring software rolled out without the s 12 policy, making it covert by default; Investigators contracted in without the employer checking the legal basis
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 22Security surveillance defence: sole security purpose, real risk and prior written notice

Where an employer relies on the defence for covert surveillance kept for workplace security, it must be able to prove that: the surveillance was solely to protect the security of the workplace or the people in it, with any surveillance of employees incidental to that; a real and significant risk existed that security would be compromised without covert surveillance; and the workforce there, or a body representing a substantial share of it, received written notice of the planned security surveillance before it began. A record from such surveillance that is unrelated to security is admitted against an employee in disciplinary or legal proceedings only where the desirability of admitting it outweighs the undesirability of evidence obtained that way.

What a reviewer asks to see: Security risk assessment showing the real and significant likelihood that required covert measures; Dated written notice to employees or their representative body of the intended security surveillance before it began; Written statement of the sole security purpose and rules preventing use of the footage for other matters
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Defence claimed without any prior written notice to staff or their representative; Security surveillance footage used to discipline staff for unrelated conduct; No documented risk assessment supporting the need for covert measures
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 11No communication or publication of private conversations or activities obtained unlawfully Text not verified against the current consolidation; open the Act before relying on it. An amending Act awaits commencement by proclamation: this text may change from that date.

No one publishes or communicates to anyone a private conversation or an activity, or a recording or account of either, that came to their knowledge directly or indirectly through use of a listening, optical surveillance or tracking device in breach of Part 2. Maximum penalty for a corporation 500 penalty units; for an individual 100 penalty units, 5 years' imprisonment, or both. Permitted: communication to a party to the conversation or activity, with the express or implied consent of all principal parties, to investigate or prosecute an offence against s 11, or in proceedings for an offence under the Act; and to the minimum reasonably needed where serious violence, substantial property damage or a serious narcotics offence is imminent. Knowledge obtained lawfully may still be communicated even if also obtained unlawfully.

What a reviewer asks to see: Review step before any recording is shared, confirming it was lawfully made or that an exception applies; Disclosure register for recordings and footage showing recipient and basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Unlawfully made recordings circulated internally or to media; Recordings shared outside the parties without every principal party's consent
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 12No possession of a record known to be obtained unlawfully Text not verified against the current consolidation; open the Act before relying on it. An amending Act awaits commencement by proclamation: this text may change from that date.

No one holds a recording of a private conversation or activity knowing it was obtained, directly or indirectly, by use of a listening, optical surveillance or tracking device in breach of Part 2. Maximum penalty for a corporation 500 penalty units; for an individual 100 penalty units, 5 years' imprisonment, or both. Holding it is allowed for the purposes of prosecuting an offence against the Act, with the express or implied consent of all principal parties or participants, or where the record was passed on in circumstances that did not breach Part 2.

What a reviewer asks to see: Procedure for quarantining and handing to police, or destroying, any recording found to have been made unlawfully; Register of recordings held with the basis for holding each
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Unlawful recordings kept on file for later use in disputes; No process when staff hand in covertly made recordings of colleagues
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 14No communication or publication of computer information from data surveillance outside the Act Text not verified against the current consolidation; open the Act before relying on it. An amending Act awaits commencement by proclamation: this text may change from that date.

No one publishes or communicates information about the input into, or output from, a computer obtained directly or indirectly by using a data surveillance device in breach of Part 2. Maximum penalty for a corporation 500 penalty units; for an individual 100 penalty units, 5 years' imprisonment, or both. Permitted: communication to the person lawfully possessing or controlling the computer, with that person's express or implied consent, to investigate or prosecute an offence against s 14, in proceedings for an offence under the Act, and to the minimum reasonably needed where serious violence, substantial property damage or a serious narcotics offence is imminent. Information obtained lawfully may still be used even if also obtained unlawfully.

What a reviewer asks to see: Control confirming data from computer monitoring is disclosed only where the monitoring was lawful or an exception applies; Disclosure log for monitoring data released outside the monitoring team
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Data taken from a personal device without consent later shared in a dispute; Monitoring output from uncontrolled devices forwarded to third parties
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.14(2)Secret monitoring only where national law allows it or on reasonable suspicion official guidance, not law

Covert monitoring should be allowed only where national law permits it or where there are reasonable grounds to suspect a crime or other grave misconduct.

What a reviewer asks to see: Authorization record for each covert monitoring exercise with the suspicion and grounds, or the legal provision relied on; End date and review of each exercise
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Covert monitoring used for general performance concerns
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 15No surveillance in change rooms, toilets, showers or bathing facilities

The employer does not carry out, or cause, any surveillance of its employees in a change room, toilet, shower or other bathing area at a workplace (up to 50 penalty units). A covert surveillance authority cannot authorise surveillance in these places either (s 20(3)).

What a reviewer asks to see: Camera register and site plans showing no camera field of view covers change rooms, toilets, showers or bathing areas; Commissioning sign-off for each new camera confirming its view excludes these facilities; Written instruction to security contractors prohibiting devices in these areas
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Corridor or entry cameras whose field of view reaches into a change room or toilet area; Vendor installs cameras without the employer checking field of view; Portable or body-worn devices not covered by the prohibition in site rules
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW WSA s 16No surveillance with a work device while the employee is not at work

The employer does not use a work surveillance device (a device used to watch the employee at work) to carry out surveillance of the employee at any time the employee is outside what s 5 counts as being at work (neither at a workplace of the employer nor elsewhere performing its work). The exception is computer surveillance of the employee's use of equipment or resources the employer provided or paid for. Law enforcement agencies as employers are outside the section. Up to 50 penalty units.

What a reviewer asks to see: Configuration record showing vehicle or phone tracking is switched off or not accessed outside working time; Policy rule stating out of hours use of tracking or camera data is prohibited except computer surveillance of employer-provided equipment; Access log review showing location data was not viewed for periods when the employee was off duty
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: GPS tracking left running on take-home vehicles with data reviewed for private trips; Camera or tracking data from a work device used to investigate conduct outside work; No technical or procedural boundary between working and non-working time
Source: NSW Workplace Surveillance Act 2005, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 7(1)(a)No listening device to overhear or record a private conversation the user is not a party to

No one knowingly installs, uses, causes to be used or maintains a listening device to eavesdrop on, listen to, record or monitor a private conversation they are not taking part in. Maximum penalty for a corporation 500 penalty units; for an individual 100 penalty units, 5 years' imprisonment, or both. Exceptions include use under a warrant or emergency authorisation, under Commonwealth law (such as the Commonwealth interception and access legislation), unintentional hearing, and specified police uses. For an employer this rules out audio capture of staff conversations (for example audio-enabled CCTV in offices, meeting rooms or break areas) where the conversations are private and the employer is not a party.

What a reviewer asks to see: Device register identifying every camera, intercom, phone system or app able to capture audio, with audio disabled or its lawful basis stated; Commissioning record confirming audio functions of CCTV are switched off in areas where private conversations occur; Legal review record for any audio monitoring of staff, citing the applicable exception
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Audio-enabled CCTV installed with the microphone active by default; Meeting room or vehicle recorders capturing conversations the employer is not part of; Assumption that a sign or policy alone makes third-party audio capture lawful
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 7(1)(b) and (3)Recording a private conversation as a party: consent of all principal parties or a narrow exception

A party to a private conversation does not knowingly use a listening device to record it unless all the principal parties consent, expressly or impliedly, or one principal party consents and the recording is either reasonably necessary to protect that party's lawful interests or not made with the aim of passing the conversation, or an account of it, to people outside it. Penalties as for s 7(1)(a). For recorded calls or meetings, the practical route is an announcement or other basis from which every principal party's consent can be shown.

What a reviewer asks to see: Call recording announcement script or meeting recording notice played or shown to every participant before recording starts; Record of consent (recorded announcement, attendee acknowledgement, or contract clause) for each recorded channel; Procedure for staff who record conversations to protect their own lawful interests, including restrictions on sharing
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Outbound calls recorded without any announcement to the external party; Meeting recordings started by one participant without telling the others; Recordings made for self-protection later circulated to people outside the conversation
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
APP 3Collection of solicited personal information

Only collect personal information that is reasonably necessary for the entity's functions or activities, by lawful and fair means.

What a reviewer asks to see: Justification of necessity for collection; Lawful and fair collection methods; Heightened protection for sensitive information
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Over-collection; Unlawful/unfair collection; Sensitive info collected without consent
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.14(3)Continuous monitoring only for health and safety or protection of property official guidance, not law

Monitoring that never stops should be allowed only where it is needed for workplace health and safety or to protect property.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of continuous monitoring (CCTV, telematics, always-on tracking) with the health, safety or property ground for each
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Always-on webcam or activity tracking for remote staff justified by productivity
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 5.6Monitoring data not the sole basis of performance evaluation official guidance, not law

Output from electronic surveillance should never be the sole input when a worker's performance is judged.

What a reviewer asks to see: Appraisal procedure listing the evidence sources considered besides monitoring data; Sample appraisals showing other inputs (manager review, outputs, feedback)
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Productivity scores from activity tracking used as the whole appraisal
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
APP 11Security of personal information

Take reasonable steps to protect personal information from misuse, interference, loss and unauthorised access, modification or disclosure, and destroy or de-identify it when no longer needed.

What a reviewer asks to see: Information security controls for personal information; Destruction/de-identification of redundant PI
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: PI not secured; Redundant PI retained
Source: Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 8.5Retain only as long as the purpose justifies official guidance, not law

Keep personal data only as long as the specific purposes of collection justify, unless a worker asks to stay on a candidate list for a set period, national law requires retention, or the employer or worker needs the data for legal proceedings about an existing or former employment relationship.

What a reviewer asks to see: Retention schedule for worker data including monitoring records, citing purpose, legal requirement or proceedings; Deletion logs
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring recordings kept indefinitely; Unsuccessful applicants' data kept without their agreement
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 9Tracking device only with the consent of the person, or of whoever holds the object

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a tracking device to find where a person is without that person's express or implied consent, or where an object is unless whoever lawfully possesses or controls it has given express or implied consent. Maximum penalty as for s 7. Exceptions cover warrants or emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, and installation, use or maintenance for a lawful purpose. Employer GPS on its own vehicles or devices rests on the employer's possession or control, together with the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 notice duties; tracking an employee personally, or through their own phone or car, needs that person's consent.

What a reviewer asks to see: Asset register showing each tracked vehicle or device is owned, leased or controlled by the employer; Written consent from employees before any tracking app is installed on a personal phone or a tracker is fitted to a personal vehicle; Record of the lawful purpose for each tracking deployment
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Location tracking app installed on employees' personal phones without consent; Tracker left on a vehicle after it was sold or returned to its owner; Tracking of individuals rather than assets with no consent record
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 10Data surveillance device only with consent to entry or interference

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a data surveillance device at premises to capture or watch what goes into or comes out of a computer there, where that requires going onto the premises without the owner's or occupier's express or implied consent, or tampering with the computer or a network on the premises when whoever lawfully possesses or controls it has given no express or implied consent. Maximum penalty as for s 7. Exceptions cover warrants, Commonwealth law and the Witness Protection Act 1995. Monitoring software on employer-owned and controlled computers and networks rests on the employer's own consent, with the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 policy and notice duties; monitoring an employee's personally owned computer needs that person's consent.

What a reviewer asks to see: Endpoint inventory showing monitoring agents are installed only on employer-owned or employer-controlled devices; Written consent before monitoring software is installed on any personally owned device (BYOD enrolment agreement); Network monitoring scope document limited to employer-controlled networks
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring agent pushed to personal laptops through a BYOD profile without explicit consent; Keystroke or screenshot capture on devices the employer does not control; Third-party network traffic captured without the network controller's consent
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
NSW SDA s 8Optical surveillance device only with consent to entry or interference

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains an optical surveillance device on or in premises, a vehicle or another object to watch or visually record an activity, where that requires going onto the premises or into the vehicle without the owner's or occupier's express or implied consent, or tampering with the vehicle or object when whoever lawfully possesses or controls it has given no express or implied consent. Maximum penalty as for s 7. Exceptions cover warrants, Commonwealth law, device retrieval, specified law enforcement searches, Tasers and police body-worn video. An employer installing cameras on its own premises or vehicles has the owner's or occupier's consent; the concern arises for devices placed in employees' homes, private vehicles or belongings, or on a client's or landlord's premises without their consent.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of each camera location showing that the employer owns or occupies it, or holds written consent from the owner or occupier; Written consent from the owner or lawful controller before cameras are fitted to leased, client or contractor property or vehicles; Rule prohibiting cameras on or in employees' private vehicles, homes or belongings without their consent
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Cameras fitted in shared or leased areas without the landlord's or other occupier's consent; Dashcams installed in employees' private cars used for work without consent; Remote-work camera monitoring set up on home premises without the occupier's agreement
Source: NSW Surveillance Devices Act 2007, read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 5.1Fair, employment-related processing within the law official guidance, not law

5.1 Lawful, fair and employment-related processing. Handle workers' data lawfully and fairly, and solely for reasons that bear directly on the person's job.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of worker data processing activities, each with its employment-related reason and legal basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Data collected for reasons unrelated to the job, such as off-duty social media activity
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.5No data on sex life, beliefs or convictions, save exceptionally official guidance, not law

Employers should not collect data on a worker's sex life, political, religious or other beliefs, or criminal convictions, except in rare cases where national law permits it and the information bears directly on a decision about the job.

What a reviewer asks to see: Data inventory confirming these categories are not collected, or the documented exception and legal basis where they are
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Criminal record checks for every role regardless of relevance
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026
ILO code para 6.6No data on union membership or activities unless required official guidance, not law

Employers should not collect data on a worker's membership of a workers' organization or trade union activities unless the law or a collective agreement requires or permits it.

What a reviewer asks to see: Review of HR and monitoring systems confirming union data are not collected except under a stated legal or agreement basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Monitoring tools flag union-related email or chat
Source: ILO Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers' Personal Data 1997 (official guidance, not law), read 30 Sep 2026

See the specimen plan run Plan your own list