Employee Monitoring Law Planner
Sources

Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999

Law. Placed at Victoria. Read 30 Sep 2026; 4 provisions cited by the planner.

Vic SDA s 9BNo optical or listening device in workplace toilets, washrooms, change rooms or lactation rooms

No employer knowingly installs, uses or maintains a camera or other optical surveillance device, or any listening device, to watch, listen to, record or monitor what workers do or say in workplace toilets, washrooms, lactation rooms or change rooms. This applies whether or not the workers consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, and where a condition of a liquor licence under the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 requires it. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; otherwise 1200 penalty units; officers of a body corporate who fail to exercise due diligence are liable (s 32A), and for an unincorporated body or firm the members of its committee of management or the partners are liable (s 9D).

What a reviewer asks to see: Site plans marking every toilet, washroom, change room and lactation room, with confirmation no camera or microphone covers them; Commissioning sign-off on camera fields of view and audio settings near these rooms; Written instruction to security and facilities contractors prohibiting devices in these rooms; Where a liquor licence condition requires coverage, a copy of the condition and a record limiting coverage to it
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Lactation rooms not identified as prohibited areas; Entry cameras with views into change rooms or washrooms; Assumption that worker consent makes such surveillance lawful
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 7No optical device on a private activity without every party's consent

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains an optical surveillance device to watch or visually record a private activity they are not part of unless every party to it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, law enforcement officers on premises with the occupier's authority where reasonably necessary to protect someone's lawful interests, and incidental recording by the overt use of body-worn cameras or tablets by police, ambulance officers and prescribed persons. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). Because a private activity excludes activity outside a building or where the parties ought to expect being observed, openly signed workplace CCTV in ordinary work areas is generally outside s 7, while cameras watching activity in places where workers reasonably expect privacy need consent (and Part 2A bans some places outright).

What a reviewer asks to see: Camera register with the location of each camera and an assessment of whether activity there could be private; Signage and worker notice showing cameras are overt, supporting that activity in view is not private; Consent record for any camera observing areas where private activities may occur
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Hidden cameras in offices or rooms where workers reasonably expect privacy; Cameras whose view reaches into private areas without consent; No assessment of whether a camera location captures private activity
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 6No listening device on a private conversation without every party's consent

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a listening device to eavesdrop on, listen to, record or monitor a private conversation they are not part of unless every party to it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, specified law enforcement safety monitoring with one party's consent, and incidental recording by the overt use of body-worn cameras or tablets by police, ambulance officers and prescribed persons. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). A party to a conversation recording it is not caught by s 6, but communicating or publishing that recording is restricted by s 11. For employers, audio capture of workers' private conversations (for example audio-enabled CCTV, call or meeting recording by a non-party) needs the consent of every party.

What a reviewer asks to see: Register of devices able to capture audio, with audio disabled or the consent basis recorded for each; Call and meeting recording notices that obtain the consent of every party where the employer or its system is not itself a party; Legal review record before any audio monitoring of workers
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: CCTV with audio enabled in offices, break rooms or vehicles; Supervisors listening in to private conversations through intercoms or phone systems; Reliance on a sign where consent from each party is needed
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026
Vic SDA s 8No tracking device without the consent of the person, or of whoever holds the object

No one knowingly installs, uses or maintains a tracking device to find where a person is without that person's express or implied consent, or where an object is unless whoever lawfully possesses or controls it has given express or implied consent. Exceptions: warrants and emergency authorisations, Commonwealth law, and orders under the Serious Offenders Act 2018, parole orders, community correction orders, prison governor orders and bail electronic monitoring conditions. Maximum for an individual: 2 years' imprisonment or a 240 penalty unit fine (both level 7), or both; for a body corporate 1200 penalty units. Officers who fail to exercise due diligence are also liable (s 32A). Employer GPS on vehicles or devices it lawfully possesses or controls rests on that possession or control; tracking a worker as a person, or through their own phone or vehicle, needs the worker's consent.

What a reviewer asks to see: Asset register showing each tracked vehicle or device is owned, leased or controlled by the employer; Written worker consent before tracking through personal phones, apps or personal vehicles; Tracking policy stating what is tracked, when, and on what basis
Where monitoring plans usually fall short: Location apps installed on personal phones without consent; Tracking of workers as individuals (for example wearables) without consent; Trackers left active on vehicles no longer in the employer's possession
Source: Victorian Surveillance Devices Act 1999, read 30 Sep 2026

Open the full text on compliance.theartofservice.com

See the specimen plan run Plan your own list